Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Article history: Received 8 November 2006 Received in revised form 13 November 2008 Accepted 17 November 2008 Available online 24 November 2008
منابع مشابه
Providing a Model for Explaining the Galatia Effect on Auditor's Wise Decision Making
Entrance to the specialized audit profession requires to making decision and having distinct attributes and properties, which the capability of taking wise decision is one of them. The task of auditors as a specialized profession is opinion about financial statement that in turn to it requires to auditor’s neutrality in decisions. If auditors be independent from clients, in the best possible wa...
متن کاملUse of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden
Background The inclusion of cost-effectiveness data, as a basis for priority setting rankings, is a distinguishing feature in the formulation of the Swedish national guidelines. Guidelines are generated with the direct intent to influence health policy and support decisions about the efficient allocation of scarce healthcare resources. Certain medical conditions may be given higher priority ran...
متن کاملExplaining Courage in Ethical Decision-making by Nursing Managers: A Qualitative Content Analysis
Introduction: Ethical decision-making by nursing managers is influenced by various essential factors, such as courage, without which it is impossible to act on them. Objective: This study aimed to explore the experiences of nursing managers about courage in ethical decision-making. Materials and Methods: The current study was conducted in Iran by a qualitative content analysis approach in 201...
متن کاملUsing Arguments for Making Decisions: A Possibilistic Logic Approach
Humans currently use arguments for explaining choices which are already made, or for evaluating potential choices. Each potential choice has usually pros and cons of various strengths. In spite of the usefulness of arguments in a decision making process, there have been few formal proposals handling this idea if we except works by Fox and Parsons and by Bonet and Geffner. In this paper we propo...
متن کاملExplaining Qualitative Decision under Uncertainty by Argumentation
Decision making under uncertainty is usually based on the comparative evaluation of different alternatives by means of a decision criterion. In a qualitative setting, pessimistic and optimistic criteria have been proposed. In that setting, the whole decision process is compacted into a criterion formula on the basis of which alternatives are compared. It is thus impossible for an end user to un...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Artif. Intell.
دوره 173 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009